๐๐ต๐ผ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐๐ฒ โ ๐ง๐ถ๐ฝ #๐ฎ: ๐ฌ๐ผ๐โ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ข๐น๐ฑ?
There seems to be a prevailing attitude that if the character in a monologue is 55-years-old, then only an actor in that age range can perform it. Likewise, if a character is 22-years-old, then only a younger actor can tackle it. And that, quite frankly, is nonsense.
If it were the play itself that was being cast, then yes, clearly the actor would need to be somewhere in the same age range as the character he or she is auditioning for. But a monologue taken from a play is taken out of context of the source material and becomes a separate, stand-alone piece of work. It becomes, in effect, a tiny little play in and of itself.
Therefore, providing the text of the monologue doesnโt contain any age-related information (which, by the way, you can often simply edit out) or isnโt written in a style that would denote great maturity or profound naivety, thereโs absolutely no reason for you to have to restrict yourself so slavishly to a characterโs age in the original material.
That little monologue is your little play, and if you have an affinity for a particular piece, it doesnโt matter where it comes from, only that you can inhabit it and make it your own.